Rejected disabled CAT-taker moves court against IIMs : Contends institutes leave disabled category seats vacant

Mayura Janwalkar.

Do the IIMs adequately fill up the disability quota for students?

No, thinks Rahul Girreddy, who took CAT this year and has filed a petition against the IIMs in the Bombay high court.  The commerce graduate contends in his petition that the IIMs are not complying with the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (PD) Act, 1995.  “Though there are 90 to 100 seats reserved for DAs (differently-abled candidates), only approximately 55 candidates are short-listed collectively by the IIMs for the second phase of the selection process,” the petition states. Under the PD Act, 3% of seats in educational institutions have to be reserved for DA candidates. But the number of seats provided by the IIMs against the quota does not amount to 3%, the petition states.

It states that IIM-A stipulates that SC/ST/DA candidates should score at least 17% in each of the three sections of CAT. Accordingly, 396 DA candidates should have been eligible for interviews this year. But the IIMs put the cut-off for the three categories at 80 percentile — much above what the 17% per subject would yield — and called only 31 candidates for interviews. Girreddy contends that even if all the IIMs were to set their cut-off at say 60 percentile — like  IIM-Indore — only 55 DA candidates would have been selected, leaving many seats vacant, which would then be filled up with candidates from the general category. Girreddy, who secured 46.20 percentile, was certain of getting an interview call.

But the high cut-off dashed his hopes. Terming the conditions laid down by the IIMs “illogical”, Girreddy states in his petition: “Though the IIMs do make a provision for 3% of their seats to be reserved for DAs, the modus operandi adopted by the IIMs defeats the provisions of the PD Act, frustrates the objective set out for the state in the constitution, and causes a colossal waste of public money.”  Girreddy’s father GS Reddy says the case will be mentioned before a division bench of the court on Monday, and a date of hearing sought. If the court gives a judgment favourable to Girreddy, it will affect the percentile scores of all candidates.

DNA Bombay

Sign Language in Court

Dear All

It’s encouraging that the Court is now accepting Sign Language as a Language  for Deaf People in Bangladesh. Here is a link of the Daily Prothom Alo with news of Narshingdhi District where the Court accepted Sign Language for two Deaf witness. This is not for the first time in Bangladesh. There are few such examples in the past. It actually depends on the desire of the Judge. But this is first time (so far I know) such a news has been published in the leading National Daily.

I am sure that this news will encourage other Courts to accept Sign Language in Judicial System.

http://www.prothom-alo.net/V1/mcat.news.details.php?nid=MTY1ODY3&mid=NQ==

Thanks Masura Apa (the reporter of the news) for your passion and your commitment for Deaf Community, as well as for the disability movement. Bravo Munmun Apa (the interpreter at the Court), you are brave and hardworking. Thanks to SDSL. Special thanks to the President of Nashigdhi Deaf Club Abdul Mabud Bhai. Gratefulness to the Honorable Judge Mr. Anwar Sadat.

Finally salute to a Change Agent who is still invisible but working as a real fighting personality. Salute

Md. Zahidul Kabir
Coordinator & Team Leader, Programs
NFOWD
8/9, Block-A, Lalmatia
Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh

Phone: 88-02-8120415, 9124487 (Ext-103)
Cell:  01711667197
Fax:  88-02-9124487 (Ext-107)
E-mail:  zahid.nfowd@gmail.com